This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |
| pub:research [2024/09/20 17:59] – IWINAC2024 added kkutt | pub:research [2025/02/01 12:14] (current) – kkutt |
|---|
| |
| ===== Papers ===== | ===== Papers ===== |
| | |
| | === KES2024 === |
| | * J. Ignatowicz, K. Kutt, and G. J. Nalepa, “**Evaluation and Comparison of Emotionally Evocative Image Augmentation Methods**,” //Procedia Computer Science//, vol. 246, pp. 3073–3082, 2024 |
| | * DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.365|10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.365]] |
| | * [[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.365|Full text available online]] |
| | * ++Abstract | Experiments in affective computing are based on stimulus datasets that, in the process of standardization, receive metadata describing which emotions each stimulus evokes. In this paper, we explore an approach to creating stimulus datasets for affective computing using generative adversarial networks (GANs). Traditional dataset preparation methods are costly and time consuming, prompting our investigation of alternatives. We conducted experiments with various GAN architectures, including Deep Convolutional GAN, Conditional GAN, Auxiliary Classifier GAN, Progressive Augmentation GAN, and Wasserstein GAN, alongside data augmentation and transfer learning techniques. Our findings highlight promising advances in the generation of emotionally evocative synthetic images, suggesting significant potential for future research and improvements in this domain.++ |
| |
| === IWINAC2024a === | === IWINAC2024a === |
kkutt